To test the hypothesis for the second time, I decided to interview five
people who work in two companies in South Florida that I feel may not have the
need for effective talent acquisition programs – an air conditioning company
and a call center outsourcing company. Both companies have continual
advertising that they are hiring for all positions.
Who:
I interviewed two HR leaders and one Area Manager for the air conditioning
company and two supervisors for the call center company. Each interviewee
communicated that they are always looking to hire, but the goal of their hiring
was not due to a lack of people talent. The very nature of their businesses are
built upon hiring candidates that will be able to follow repeatable processes
such as repairing an air conditioner step by step in accordance with company
and state standards or following a call script for each customer calling into
the call center, not on the talent of the candidates they are hiring.
What:
Their hiring needs differ from other companies who are focused on increasing
the talent. These companies are interviewing for and hiring candidates they
feel will be comfortable working in the same environment performing the same
tasks over and over for long periods of time. Due to this, they will actually
hire more candidates than necessary, knowing that after the standard 90-day
probationary period that they will have some new hires quit after realizing
they don’t enjoy the work or they will have to fire some of the new hires who
were not able to demonstrate they can perform the repeatable tasks at a
satisfactory level.
Why:
The cause of their hiring is different than hypothesis part one because
it is not a talent-based need. It is a volume-based need focused on one skill –
following directions. They are typically not hiring college degreed candidates,
so there is not as much competition among other competitors for who they are
hiring.
|
Inside the Boundary
|
Outside the Boundary
|
|
Who: Tech companies or companies with “sexy” products
|
Who: Companies that are either skills-trade based or customer
service outsourcing
|
|
What the Need Is: Better talent acquisition programs in order
to attract and hire better people talent than their competitors
|
What the Need Is Not: It is not talent; The need is to cast a
wide net in order to hire people who will follow processes
|
|
Why the Need Exists: For the companies, the better people
talent they hire, the greater the likelihood is that they will develop better
products which will help increase revenue.
|
Alternative Explanations: These companies are providing
services to other companies and customers that aren’t about continually improving
the work, it is about consistency and having the same expected results every
time.
|
Hey Justin,
ReplyDeleteTalent acquisition is definitely something I think all companies should be worried about, so it is interesting you were able to find ones that weren't. What were they? Regardless of industry, I think overall hiring more qualified and talented employees could be beneficial to any company. With the rise of technology, skills trade based companies are still at risk of being outed by AI. Anything to stop that from happening, even if it means going through the trouble of creating a talent acquisition system, is something to be looked into.
Hey Justin, talent acquisition is a a huge marketplace especially in the age of social media and influencers. I like how you included tech companies with "sexy" products, I couldn't agree more on this comment.Talent acquisition is definitely a tough market to grasp as some companies as you noted are looking for constant results rather than improvement.AI can definitely be of value to track talent and make job offerings.
ReplyDelete